![]() ![]() In both cases we can get started with your own material! The webinars are often an introduction to the software, but can also be interesting for advanced users with specialist questions. Sometimes one-on-one, sometimes for larger groups. For example for QDA software such as ATLAS.ti or NVivo, but also for transcription software such as NVivo Transcription. Thanks for your view, helped me to realized maybe the ideal way wont come and its a matter of just giving a try to see if my colleagues are available.We regularly provide webinars. That being said, I am again thinking to just reach out my colleagues, have a stipend for them and ask them if they would consider the offer. And again, I do prefer traditional analysis made with paper, highlight and a notebook. I've been "playing" and working with Nvivo this weekend as well as Atlasti. That's the reason why I intended to consider the software analysis. Yet, thing is I know my colleagues have veeeery busy tight schedules. ![]() And after creating a code book with categories doing meetings with comitee jury to saturate the anaylsis. In my personal preference, I'd prefer to traditionally, code after having the transcripts of the information. I've been eyeing Nvivo, and Atlasti given the circumstance that my comitee director ask me to either use one of those tools, or request colleagues to collaborate as comitee/jury for my qualitative analysis. If your post has been caught up in the spam filter please message the moderators and please INCLUDE A LINK to your post We're trying something new! Please join our discussion of the secrets of academia! r/science /r/physics /r/chemistry /r/hardscience /r/softscience /r/Answers /r/AskReddit Other Subreddits that might be relevant to academics General School Related Sub-reddits: Higher Education Questions about history: /r/AskHistoriansĭirectory of Scientific Sub-reddits: /r/MethodHub Specific questions about scientific phenomena may be better suited for AskScience. Avoid ad hominem attacks, treat people online broadly as a reasonable person would treat a relative stranger in person, and help us out by reporting any posts which fall foul of this policy. If an idea is a bad one, please do tell someone that it is in no uncertain terms. This includes off-topic and unproductive discussion as well as rudeness.ĭisagreement is completely fine, encouraged even, when there are different perspectives to share. If a reasonable person wouldn't say it to a professor/colleague/conference speaker they don't know well, it's probably over the line. Both are better resources on those subjects. And questions about graduate admissions will be referred to /r/gradadmissions. Questions about what university you should attend will be referred to /r/college. Your university probably has confidential counseling make use of it. You know it's inappropriate, and we're not going to tell you any different. ![]() Questions about your uncontrollable desire for your student/professor will be deleted. Questions from current and former undergraduates, graduates, PhDs, post-docs, professors and laymen all welcome! Mods may delete posts which do not provide enough context. This might include, for example, your career stage, your subject discipline, the type of institution you're affiliated with, and/or the country you're in. Your post should comprise a question (albeit potentially an open-ended one) and must contain sufficient information to enable posters to provide an effective answer. Posts that will invoke critical thinking and healthy discussion are especially welcome. This subreddit is for discussing academic life, and for asking questions directed towards people involved in academia, (both science and humanities).įeel free to post interesting links within self-posts. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |